Advocate Pooja Agarwal
Whoever commits criminal breach of trust shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
IPC Section 406 deals with the punishment for criminal breach of trust. A criminal breach of trust is when someone entrusted with property or assets misappropriates or misuses them dishonestly, violating the trust placed in them. This offence carries a punishment of imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both.
Notable Cases:
For a criminal breach of trust to occur, it must be established that the accused was entrusted with property or dominion over it and dishonestly misused or converted it for personal gain. This misappropriation or conversion must be in violation of legal directions or contracts.
As per Section 24 of the IPC, dishonest intention refers to doing an act with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person.
Under Section 405 of the IPC, the accused must have entertained a dishonest intention while committing the offence of criminal breach of trust. This means the accused must have intended to cause wrongful loss to the person who entrusted him with the property.
The act must have been committed deliberately, intentionally, and not by accident or inadvertence.
Section 406 of the IPC is the penal provision for the offence of criminal breach of trust, as defined under Section 405 of the IPC.
When an accused commits the offence of criminal breach of trust under Section 405, IPC, they will be punished under Section 406, IPC with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with a fine, or with both.
Criminal breach of trust is similar to embezzlement, which involves the misappropriation of funds or assets entrusted to someone for a specific purpose. However, the specific definitions and legal consequences can vary depending on the jurisdiction.
Yes, there are several aggravated versions of the offence of criminal breach of trust under the IPC. These are penal situations that borrow their criminality from Section 405 and build upon its intensity:
The trial for criminal breach of trust under Section 406 follows the general procedure for criminal trials in India, governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The key stages of the trial are as follows:
The police file a final report under Section 173, CrPC, after completing the investigation. This can be a closure report or charge sheet:
If the evidence collected against the accused is sufficient to support prosecution before a court of law and justify their continued detention, the police will file a charge sheet under Section 173 of the CrPC and, according to Section 170, send the accused under the custody of the Magistrate.
A charge sheet includes the following details:
Once the Magistrate takes cognizance, they may issue summons or warrants for the accused's appearance. At the hearing, the Magistrate may discharge the accused, close the case, or frame charges and proceed to trial.
Once charges are framed, the accused is asked whether they plead guilty or not guilty. If they plead guilty, the Magistrate can convict them, but the plea must be voluntary. If the accused denies the charges and claims trial, the case will proceed to trial.
On the designated date, the prosecution presents evidence to prove the accused’s guilt. This may include oral and documentary evidence, and witnesses are called to testify and may be cross-examined by the defense.
After the prosecution concludes, the accused is given an opportunity to explain the evidence against them, as per Section 313 of the CrPC. This statement can be used against the accused later if necessary, though it is not taken under oath.
The accused may present their defense, including oral or documentary evidence. The prosecution can call witnesses to challenge the defense's version of events.
After evidence is presented, both the prosecution and the defense present their final arguments. The prosecution argues first, followed by the defense, as per Section 314 of the CrPC.
After considering the evidence and arguments, the judge will deliver the judgment. If the accused is found guilty, they will be convicted; if not, they will be acquitted. In case of conviction, both sides will be heard regarding the sentence.
The right to appeal is governed by CrPC. An appeal is typically filed against a conviction, but certain restrictions apply:
Specific sections of the CrPC, such as Section 265G, Section 375, and Section 376, outline situations where no appeal can be filed.
Yes, since the offence of 'punishment for criminal breach of trust' under Section 406, IPC is a cognizable offence, a police officer can arrest a person suspected to have committed such an offence without a warrant from the Court (a warrant is a Court-order authorising a police officer to carry out an arrest).
No, the offence under Section 406, IPC is not bailable.
The severity of the offence under Section 406, IPC is so significant that it has been characterized as a non-bailable offence.
To get bail in such cases, the accused needs to have strong reasons. Depending on where the case is at, the accused can apply for regular bail after being arrested or ideally apply for anticipatory bail before being arrested. The court will look at factors like the accused's past, their social status, the reason for committing the crime, and the police report. If all these elements support the accused, bail may be granted. It is advisable to seek assistance from an experienced criminal lawyer in such cases.
The offence under Section 406, IPC is compoundable, meaning that the law allows a compromise between the victim and the offender.
However, as per Section 320, CrPC, such an offence may only be compounded by the victim (the owner of the property in which the breach of trust occurred), with the permission of the Court where the prosecution is pending.
Facing criminal charges, whether serious or minor, is a significant matter that can lead to consequences such as imprisonment, heavy fines, and social repercussions like damage to reputation. It is important to seek guidance from a qualified criminal lawyer who can advise on your rights and work towards the best possible outcome for your case.
A qualified criminal lawyer can help you understand the charges, your rights before and after arrest, available defences, potential plea bargains, and post-trial expectations. It is advisable to prepare a timeline of events to effectively brief the lawyer and collaborate in formulating a trial strategy. In cases related to Section 406 of the IPC, having legal representation is especially valuable.
You may also refer to LawRato’s Criminal Law Guide for more information and explore a comprehensive list of all sections under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to understand Indian law better.
Contact a top-rated lawyer in your city for detailed legal advice.
Talk to a Lawyer
What kinds of questions can I ask?
You can ask about anything related to your legal situation. Get advice, strategic coaching, or a second opinion.
How can I keep my identity private?
Your query and responses will be published without your details. Lawyers may contact you to discuss your issue.
When can I expect a reply?
You can expect a response within 24 working hours.
How can I find if my question was answered?
You will be notified by Email and SMS whenever your question receives an answer.
Lawyers and law offices are not allowed to solicit clients or advertise, according to the Bar Council of India's guidelines:
By clicking the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are independently looking for information about Singhania & Partners LLP (S&P) and that no advertisements, personal communications, solicitations, invitations, or other forms of inducement of any kind have been made by or on behalf of S&P or any of its members to solicit work through this website.